Review of the Mexican UFO Hearings

It’s puzzling that scientists claim UFO researchers aren’t conducting legitimate science, yet they themselves fail to engage in the necessary investigations. There is significant work to be done in this field. However, funding is often a barrier, as science tends to pursue financial support rather than genuine inquiry. This is quite scandalous.

Scientific exploration demands replication and a collaborative community. Volunteers are essential; if research is solely driven by funding, the scope and depth of discoveries will inevitably be limited. We need a multitude of inquisitive minds willing to delve into these mysteries!

The PhD-level researchers examining the Mexican aliens are reputable individuals asserting that these entities are indeed real and were interred approximately a millennium ago. They presented their findings and opened a dialogue, yet critics remain who have not even considered the data presented.

How can scientists critique findings they haven’t physically examined or analyzed?

This situation echoes the case of the Starchild Skull, dated back to 900 years ago. The tests reveal unusual characteristics that warrant further investigation. These anomalies could profoundly influence our understanding of not just history, but also medical science. If the Starchild Skull belongs to a being that survived with several conditions without modern medical aid, that in itself is astonishing.

If there were interventions in medicine back then, it raises questions about the inadequacies of current medical science. If these remains are indeed alien, it highlights a failure in the scientific community to fully comprehend humanity’s context in the universe. MUFON, a non-profit organization, aims to study UFOs for the benefit of humanity and is powered by volunteers.

Paid researchers often dismiss volunteer scientists. Do they not understand that charitable efforts can enhance the world?

If you missed the previous discussion, you can find Melanie Young’s video below, where she explores the Starchild and its broader implications, calling on the scientific community to step up. She has no financial incentive in this pursuit.

Many academically inclined individuals have been conducting remarkable work in the field of UFO studies, yet their contributions often go unrecognized. We must acknowledge the efforts of notable figures like John E. Mack. Here’s another example:

The Friends We Make Along the Way

Where are our allies in this exploration? Will a scandal be necessary to awaken society to the truth that nothing is as it appears? Currently, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) is under scrutiny, a situation that has persisted since its formation, drawing skepticism from various groups, including UFO skeptics and established lawmakers. As Congressman Burchett has repeatedly pointed out, merely increasing funding does not equate to progress.

The reality is that simply pouring more money into a project does not guarantee improvement. If we could eliminate even a fraction of the corruption at the top, we might recover a significant portion of the funds the government currently mismanages. The trickle-down economic model has proven ineffective; a trickle-up approach is more beneficial. Nature thrives when the base is nurtured. If only those at the top are prioritized, we face conflict, despair, and extinction.

Perhaps this is why Gene Roddenberry envisioned an innovative economic system in Star Trek, where humanity exists in a state of freedom, equality, and harmony unimaginable by previous ideologies. The impact of Star Trek has been profound, creating a cultural phenomenon that spawned fan fiction and conventions.

For humanity to have a sustainable future, transparency and functionality must extend to all beings, not just humans. Our existence is intertwined with nature, and technology must blend seamlessly with our environment.

Could it be that Kirkpatrick’s departure isn’t a scandal but rather a result of being unprepared for such intense scrutiny? How could anyone manage the weight of billions of observing eyes? The individual who declares "it's aliens" and backs it up with proof will likely become more famous than historical figures like Tesla, Jung, and Einstein combined.

So, what’s the game here? Why wouldn’t Kirkpatrick want to be recognized as the leading figure in alien research?

After nearly 18 months in his role, Sean Kirkpatrick, the head of AARO, has announced his retirement. He previously postponed his retirement to lead this office, claiming he has accomplished his objectives.

The anticipated transparency has not materialized. Instead, it appears to be a shell game, with UFOs and secure facilities taking the place of cups and a ball.

Kirkpatrick made headlines this summer when he responded to a whistleblower's sensational assertion that the government has concealed a long-standing initiative to reverse-engineer alien technology. At that time, he stated that AARO had found no evidence to support such claims, labeling them as "insulting."

Perhaps Kirkpatrick’s remarks on social media regarding David Grusch were inappropriate, or perhaps they reflected his frustration at being challenged by someone who was once part of the same circle. Whistleblowers often expose corruption, and numerous individuals have highlighted inconsistencies in the UFO narrative, revealing a significant amount of hypocrisy.

What kind of hypocrisy? Let’s focus on government entities that have dismissed evidence of extraterrestrial life, despite existing documents and personnel that contradict their claims. When governmental agencies assert there is no evidence of alien threats or harm, they are neglecting their responsibilities. This is particularly concerning for an office tasked with investigating reports such as UFOs allegedly disabling nuclear missiles or firing lasers at military personnel. The government acknowledges the existence of UFOs, yet AARO seems reluctant to accept evidence or even consider testimonies.

Recently, AARO has been in the spotlight, notably for its involvement in tracking a fleet of Chinese surveillance balloons.

Balloons? There was a singular balloon, which a civilian managed to track and reported to the military via social media. It was only after significant public outcry that the government acted, allowing the balloon to traverse the nation for three days without intervention. Because of this civilian engagement, NORAD finally activated its radar system, uncovering numerous unidentified objects. They even shot down several more, but chose not to release the footage or findings. If all we’re dealing with are balloons, where’s the evidence? Why the secrecy? Surely, it can’t be due to a desire to safeguard technology, as they had no issue showcasing the first balloon...

Is this not a scandal?

Despite this, lawmakers, witnesses, and UFO enthusiasts continue to voice their concerns about the government's lack of transparency regarding these phenomena.

Is Politico attempting to soften the blow of Kirkpatrick’s exit? One wonders if Kathleen Kennedy wishes her departure from Disney had been handled with similar care. Politico, please cover Kennedy’s exit so Disney can refocus on producing quality films. Let’s save Star Wars and Marvel for the benefit of humanity!

Perhaps a South Park episode about AARO would provide the perfect commentary, bringing us full circle to its origins with cows and Eric Cartman being abducted.

What will unfold next? Who will take over AARO? Will the new leadership be lackluster?

Will extraterrestrials make their presence known before humanity reaches its final chapter?

Stay tuned as this captivating series of drama, humor, and enigma unfolds more rapidly than Disney's handling of the Indiana Jones franchise.