Chapter 1: Understanding Altruism

The concept of altruism—helping others without expecting anything in return—raises an intriguing question: is it genuinely achievable? Do we truly believe that individuals can assist others devoid of self-serving motives?

During my college years, I first encountered research on altruism. As a dedicated Christian at the time, I was frustrated by the ongoing debate surrounding the existence of true altruism. “Of course it exists!” I thought. My faith taught me that love is omnipresent and is the very essence of our resurrection.

The skepticism exhibited by certain researchers only fueled my frustration. One even remarked, “Scratch an ‘altruist’, and watch a ‘hypocrite’ bleed.” It raises the question: why do these scientists harbor such a cynical view of humanity's capacity for love? Surely, their past experiences must have influenced their perspectives.

You might wonder why this topic warrants discussion. After all, altruistic actions seem prevalent; we witness people aiding one another daily without any anticipation of rewards. It’s easy to dismiss the doubts of these arrogant scientists, who, in my opinion, often overlook the obvious.

This skepticism, however, complicates the teaching of altruism. Many of my students struggle to grasp the notion that true altruism might not exist. Most people I know firmly believe in the inherent goodness of humanity. Therefore, I aim to present the argument that we may not possess the capability for altruism—note the word “may,” indicating that this viewpoint is not definitive.

I act merely as a conduit for presenting psychological theories and challenging your perspectives; my personal beliefs may differ.

Consider the following scenarios: which of these exemplifies true altruism?

1. Kate plants a tree for future generations to enjoy.
2. Billionaire Woody donates 95% of his wealth to charitable causes.
3. Helen assists a stranded motorist and says, “Don’t worry about it” before leaving.
4. Linda Hamilton, sometimes homeless herself, urges bystanders to help a man in distress.
5. Isaac adopts three dogs from local shelters.
6. Noah faithfully aids those living in poverty.

It's evident that all these individuals exhibit commendable qualities, and their actions are indeed noble. However, the true question revolves around their underlying motivations.

If you were to ask any of them, they might respond with sentiments like “it’s the right thing to do” or “I can’t bear to see others in pain.” These affirmations may genuinely reflect their beliefs. Yet, it’s also conceivable—though not definitive—that they might harbor more self-serving reasons.

For instance, consider the notion of self-validation: “I’m a nice person.” After performing a good deed, don’t we often feel a sense of pride? Or perhaps the belief in karma influences their actions: “If I help now, others will help me later.” This perspective suggests a form of self-interest, as it involves accumulating future benefits.

Alternatively, some might argue that their motivations stem from a desire to alleviate their own discomfort when witnessing the suffering of others. While this may appear altruistic, the focus remains on their feelings rather than those they are helping. If they rationalize that their assistance will make no significant difference, they may choose not to act.

Ultimately, the question remains: which of these scenarios exemplifies true altruism? The answer may be that none do. Each situation can potentially be explained by one or more self-interested motives. This doesn’t imply that these individuals are bad; in fact, they often surpass many others in their willingness to help. The real inquiry is whether humans can engage in entirely unselfish altruism.

Chapter 2: The Challenge of Altruism

The first video titled "The Science of Helping [Altruism] | Podcast" delves into the complexities of altruistic behavior, exploring whether true selflessness exists in our actions.

Another insightful video, "PSY 2510 Social Psychology: Egoistic and Altruistic Motivations for Helping," examines the motivations behind helping behavior, further enriching our understanding of altruism.

Reflecting on your own actions can be enlightening. Take a moment to consider the good deeds you’ve performed. While you may genuinely believe you are a kind person, an honest assessment might reveal that many of these acts could stem from self-interested motives.

For instance, I always hold the door open for someone walking behind me. However, if they fail to acknowledge my gesture, I might hesitate to do so again. This expectation of recognition suggests that my actions are not purely altruistic.

Similarly, when gifting someone, I often hope for reciprocation in kindness or acknowledgment. If that individual doesn’t respond positively, I may rethink my willingness to help them in the future.

It seems that many of my good deeds carry hidden self-serving motives. I do not consider myself an exemplar of pure altruism.

This leads to the conclusion that the principle of “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” often governs human interactions. While this mutually beneficial approach is functional, it doesn’t equate to true altruism.

So, does altruism truly exist?

In my view, the answer isn't a definitive "no." Scientists have yet to arrive at a conclusive stance on humanity's capacity for genuine altruism. This uncertainty arises not from a lack of research—numerous studies have explored this topic—but rather from the inherent complexity of understanding human motives, which remain a mystery.

Thus, at present, we can only assert: We do not know. However, everyone is entitled to their opinion, and I certainly have mine.

My Perspective: Altruism Exists, But It's Rare

I maintain that pure altruism is real, but only a select few individuals possess this capacity. My belief is supported by two key observations.

Firstly, psychological research indicates that under time constraints, people's instinctive reactions reveal their true motivations. This concept is explored in the Implicit Association Test (IAT), designed to uncover unconscious biases and preferences by measuring response times.

Secondly, if humanity were entirely selfish, our primary concern would be self-preservation and avoiding harm. Yet, consider the acts of heroism exhibited by individuals who, in critical moments, chose to sacrifice themselves to save others. If everyone were selfish, these selfless actions would contradict that assumption.

Though these examples may not constitute definitive scientific proof, they suggest that not all humans are insincere in their motivations.

If you appreciate this article, consider subscribing!