Why Unpleasant Individuals Tend to Achieve Greater Success
Written on
Chapter 1: The Paradox of Success
Recent studies have shed light on why unpleasant individuals often find themselves more successful in their careers. Surprisingly, the explanation is rather straightforward.
Historically, there are numerous instances of disagreeable, oppressive figures climbing to significant career heights. A prime example is Steve Jobs, who played a pivotal role in rescuing Apple from the brink of bankruptcy, transforming it into one of the most prosperous companies globally. Despite this, Jobs was not known for his patience or tact in workplace interactions, frequently making disparaging remarks about his colleagues' efforts.
One might assume that unpleasant people achieve success due to their superior intelligence or creativity, but a new investigation suggests otherwise. Researchers found that these individuals are more adept at defending their viewpoints, even when their ideas seem insignificant or diverge from popular opinion.
Section 1.1: Research Insights
In a study detailed on the British Psychological Society's official blog, researchers Samuel Hunter and Lily Cushenberry focused on individuals with less-than-pleasant traits such as arrogance, self-importance, tenacity, and hostility.
Initially, around 200 university seniors underwent personality assessments. They also provided data regarding their average grades and results from university entrance exams. This approach allowed the researchers to evaluate both cognitive abilities and academic achievements.
Following this, each student was assigned an individual task: to propose a solution to a specific marketing challenge within ten minutes. Subsequently, students were grouped into teams of three to collaboratively develop a marketing plan in just 20 minutes.
As anticipated, there were no issues during the individual tasks; however, during group activities, ideas from students with challenging personalities were frequently incorporated into the final project.
Subsection 1.1.1: Group Dynamics
Section 1.2: The Role of Criticism
In a follow-up experiment, researchers aimed to determine how unpleasant individuals react to criticism in various situations. Nearly 300 students participated in a task where they had to brainstorm gift ideas for their university.
They were placed in an online chat setting with two individuals who were, unbeknownst to them, also researchers. These individuals were instructed to either endorse or critique the students' ideas. After developing gift suggestions, the participants were tasked with envisioning potential designs for future dormitory rooms. Again, their chat partners provided feedback while also sharing their own ideas.
The findings from the first experiment were reinforced. When brainstorming individually, unpleasant individuals did not exhibit their characteristic behavior. However, once their chat partners began to share their thoughts and critiques, the unpleasant individuals became more assertive in defending their viewpoints.
Chapter 2: The Resilience of Unpleasant Personalities
The first video, "Why Do Bad People Get Ahead in Life?" explores the dynamics behind the success of those with abrasive personalities, emphasizing how resilience plays a crucial role in their achievements.
The second video, "Why do so many incompetent men become leaders?" by Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, discusses the phenomenon of leadership among individuals who may not possess the typical qualities associated with effective leadership.
The experiments demonstrated that abrasive individuals are often undeterred by criticism and remain convinced of their correctness. In contrast, more agreeable individuals tend to be influenced by positive feedback.
While the researchers acknowledge certain limitations in their study—such as the focus on university students, which may not represent the broader population—they highlight an important takeaway: it is not necessarily that unpleasant individuals are more intelligent or creative; rather, their ability to persist in the face of negative feedback sets them apart.
Ultimately, success does not require one to be a "bad" person; it simply involves being resilient and steadfast in your beliefs. It’s about not retreating after encountering criticism. Individuals who are more assertive in competitive environments often outpace their more agreeable counterparts. While we do not advocate for tyrannical behavior, a little more determination can go a long way.