# Understanding How Intelligent Individuals Fall for Conspiracy Theories
Written on
Chapter 1: The Psychological Basis for Belief in Conspiracy Theories
In the past, I held the belief that supporters of Trump were simply irrational and prejudiced. Over time, however, I've come to understand that many are acting out of fear. Admittedly, it would be easier to dismiss them as wholly malevolent beings, but the reality is that many are ordinary people with genuine concerns.
I am fortunate to have attended university, where I acquired critical thinking skills essential for evaluating the media I engage with. Unfortunately, not everyone shares this privilege. I vividly recall a professor who dedicated an entire semester to teaching us about logical fallacies, equipping us to form compelling arguments.
The skills I gained in psychology allow me to discern the psychological mechanisms that drive individuals' thoughts and behaviors. This background gives me an advantage when encountering dubious information online.
Section 1.1: The Challenge of Navigating Information
Many people genuinely believe that if one simply works hard and remains optimistic, escaping poverty is achievable. However, the truth is often more complicated than that.
For those who have been exposed to conspiracy theories, their tactics can be blatantly obvious. Yet for the majority, the truth is easily obscured. It is unreasonable to expect everyone to critically assess online content with the same ease. This article aims to highlight fundamental psychological principles that can aid in developing a critical perspective on media consumption.
Confirmation Bias
The first concept to explore is confirmation bias, which is our tendency to seek out and accept information that aligns with our existing beliefs. I, too, fall prey to this bias at times. A crucial way to mitigate this is to resist the urge to block everyone who holds differing opinions. Social media platforms like Facebook can exacerbate this issue, creating echo chambers where users mistakenly believe that everyone shares their views. While my social media feeds lean left, I consciously make an effort to engage with contrasting viewpoints, even if I strongly disagree with them.
I know someone who has severed ties with all but conspiracy theorists on Facebook, which exemplifies how such behavior fosters extremism and hampers meaningful dialogue with those holding different beliefs.
Proportionality Bias
Another cognitive bias we often succumb to is proportionality bias. When we hear about significant events, we tend to expect equally significant explanations. This is frequently not the case. Take, for instance, the tragedy of Princess Diana's passing. She was beloved for her humanitarian efforts, and her death prompted numerous unfounded conspiracy theories alleging that the Royal Family orchestrated it. In reality, many occurrences are random and chaotic, a truth that many find hard to accept.
If a more straightforward explanation exists, it's worth questioning why we seek to complicate it. I recall learning about the principle of parsimony in science class, which suggests that when faced with multiple explanations, the simplest one is often the most accurate. We should adopt this mindset when evaluating information online. Is the moon an extraterrestrial spacecraft, or is it merely a large rock? The latter is likely the correct answer.
Understanding Conspiracy Theories and Intelligence
In the video titled "Why Smart People Become Conspiracy Theorists with Naomi Klein - Factually!" we delve into the reasons that may lead intelligent individuals to embrace such theories. This discussion sheds light on the cognitive biases and psychological factors at play.
Illusory Pattern Perception
Another cognitive tendency is illusory pattern perception, where we see patterns in random data. Humans have a propensity to overanalyze situations, leading to the belief that unrelated events are somehow connected. For example, if you had a negative experience at a garage and then noticed that your bill totaled $666, you might wonder whether your mechanic is a demon. While this may sound ridiculous, it's a reflection of our minds searching for connections.
Consider a more relatable instance: perhaps you saw a cloud that resembled a rabbit on the day your pet rabbit passed away. The inclination to perceive meaning in random events is prevalent, especially among those drawn to conspiracy theories.
Familiarity Principle
The familiarity principle, also known as the Mere Exposure Effect, describes our tendency to favor what is familiar to us. For example, that pop song you initially disliked may grow on you after repeated listens. This principle can be exploited by advertisers and conspiracy theorists alike, as continuous exposure to a concept can lead to acceptance.
Imagine coming across a conspiracy theory about the moon landing being fake shared by an old friend. Initially, it may seem absurd, but over time, repeated exposure can lead to its acceptance as a plausible belief.
Research shows that repeated exposure to conspiracy theories can strengthen belief in them. Understanding these psychological tendencies is crucial for developing a more critical view of the information we encounter online.
Chapter 2: Strategies for Critical Thinking
In the second video, "Steven Pinker: Why Smart People Believe Stupid Things," we explore the cognitive pitfalls that can lead intelligent individuals to adopt unfounded beliefs. This can provide valuable insights into our own thought processes.
By recognizing these psychological inclinations, we can start to think more critically about what we consume online. Hopefully, this article has inspired you to scrutinize your thought processes a bit more. If you're already aware of these biases, consider sharing this information with others who might benefit, especially those who seem drawn to dubious claims.