Reimagining Scrum: Beyond the Myth of Mandatory Feature Delivery
Written on
Understanding Scrum's True Purpose
It's a common misconception to view Scrum merely as a delivery framework, which can lead to unsatisfactory results. Have you ever thought about how you perceive Scrum? Is it a delivery mechanism for features or an adaptive Agile framework? A flawed perspective can hinder a team's potential, leading to subpar outcomes.
Photo by Yuriy Yosipiv on Unsplash
Recognizing Warning Signs
Be on the lookout for these red flags that indicate a misunderstanding of Scrum:
- Stakeholders expect Scrum teams to deliver new features in every Sprint.
- There's a false sense of security when velocity increases, but panic ensues if it drops.
- Task delegation becomes routine, with external parties dictating team objectives.
- Product Owners are required to approve every completed task.
- Developers are solely measured by their coding output.
- Quality is defined as being bug-free, disregarding the actual user experience.
- Adhering to processes takes precedence over exploring faster value creation methods.
Do these issues resonate with you? They certainly do with me, as I've encountered all of them firsthand, and they create significant challenges.
Section 1.1: The Misconception of Delivery
Scrum should not be reduced to merely a delivery mechanism. This misunderstanding can derail teams and lead them in unproductive directions. Many organizations mistakenly view Scrum teams as execution-focused, with no input in strategic direction. The expectation that they must deliver features on schedule aligns more closely with traditional Waterfall methodologies.
To truly grasp Scrum, we should refer to the Scrum Guide, which describes it as a lightweight framework that enables individuals, teams, and organizations to create value through adaptive solutions for complex challenges.
The essence of Scrum is captured in the following steps:
- A Product Owner prioritizes tasks related to a complex issue in the Product Backlog.
- The Scrum Team transforms selected tasks into a valuable Increment during the Sprint.
- The Scrum Team and stakeholders review outcomes and make adjustments for the next Sprint.
- Repeat the process.
A common misinterpretation arises from the phrase, “The Scrum Team turns a selection of the work into an Increment of value during a Sprint.” Many assume that every Sprint must culminate in new features, but it’s crucial to question whether these features genuinely deliver value.
The goal of a Sprint should be to generate value. Self-organizing teams should focus on identifying what truly creates value and what does not. When teams become overly fixated on outputs, they lose sight of their objectives.
Section 1.2: The Pitfalls of Scrum
Many individuals approach me seeking advice on how to enhance their Scrum practices. Typical inquiries include:
- How can we boost our performance?
- What strategies can increase our efficiency?
- What tips exist for raising our velocity?
- How can we become more predictable?
- How can we mitigate risks?
Such questions suggest a fixed mindset rather than a value-driven one. They often indicate that the organization may be utilizing Scrum without fully understanding its purpose.
When someone asks how to improve their Scrum process, my first response is, “Why are you using Scrum?” The answers can be illuminating, often revealing that Scrum was a poor fit for their needs.
Avoid employing Scrum if your primary goals include:
- Increasing output
- Enhancing predictability
- Improving performance
You may end up feeling disillusioned and frustrated.
Video Description: This video discusses whether Scrum teams should operate as component teams or feature teams, shedding light on common misconceptions.
Beyond Mere Features
Organizations often take time to realize that simply adding more features does not equate to delivering greater value. When management begins to focus on value over features, they recognize that Scrum can be effective in achieving this.
Scrum is most likely to succeed when:
- Leadership expresses dissatisfaction with current outcomes.
- Executives are willing to empower teams to prioritize goals over deadlines.
- Innovation is valued more than risk aversion.
- Exploring new opportunities takes precedence over minimizing risks.
With the right encouragement, Scrum teams can thrive and focus on creating value.
Implementing Scrum means embracing uncertainty and being willing to explore the unknown. High-performing Scrum teams take full responsibility for their outputs and strive to generate value for both users and the organization.
Final Thoughts
The Scrum Guide emphasizes that an Increment should be achieved at the end of every Sprint; however, this Increment should not be limited to features alone. Examples of valuable increments include:
- Validating or disproving critical assumptions about your business model.
- Identifying the real jobs and pain points of end-users.
- Gathering evidence to justify investing resources into a project.
The essence is that Scrum teams must be cross-functional and accountable for their results. They operate as self-managing units focused on solving end-user issues.
Real Scrum teams begin with their end goals in mind and work backward to deliver value, often navigating uncharted territories. In contrast, teams stuck in a "Waterscrumfall" mindset lack goals beyond fulfilling externally defined requirements and are often apprehensive about exploring new paths.
Strive to evolve into a genuine Scrum team, but recognize that not all organizations may be prepared for this shift. Nevertheless, don't feel powerless; advocate for leadership to understand the significance of empowerment and the need to look beyond just feature delivery.
Video Description: This video explores the implications of consistently finishing sprints with everything done, emphasizing the risks of playing it too safe.