spirosgyros.net

The Enigma of 250,000 UFO Events: Are We Ignoring the Evidence?

Written on

UFO Data:

250,000 sightings of unidentified flying objects have been recorded. These incidents are not merely anecdotal tales of farmers spotting lights in the sky or second-hand accounts from friends of pilots. Each event has been observed by multiple witnesses, accompanied by radar data, live communications, and formal reports! What did Project Blue Book suggest? Just a few hundred unexplained occurrences? The latest report to Congress may now indicate around 300 unexplainable encounters. NASA has announced plans to investigate non-military cases. If Jacques Fabrice Vallée is indeed credible, a comprehensive database of reliable information stretches back to the 1940s, and the sheer volume of these events is astonishing!

It’s Aliens

I assure you, Vallée isn’t delusional; he never has been. This dramatic assertion comes from John, who highlights that 250,000 sightings are indeed remarkable! It's the kind of revelation that would excite someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson, who often dramatizes such topics. Clearly, the public is being misled. Perhaps it’s fair to say that most people don’t look up. Many are willing to accept media or government statements and carry on with their lives.

The reason UFOs remain in public consciousness is not due to Hollywood, but rather because the phenomena are real and people continue to report inexplicable experiences.

Ignoring reality does not erase it.

Among those who are informed, the government and media's dismissal has bred fear and skepticism, reflected in prevailing narratives. I harbor a general distrust of government; I recognize they lie. Some claim that aliens are deceitful! In this chaotic world, whom can we truly trust?

For those of us in the know, it’s clear that UFOs are genuine, they are not of human origin, and the resistance to this idea is so severe that not only do we seem eccentric, but we also often question our own beliefs. The U.S. government’s recent acknowledgment was a sigh of relief for many, but it still falls short of addressing the full scope of what is occurring!

Statistical Insights Indicate Intelligence

The necessary research has yet to be conducted. Vallée expresses his views based on the existing database: if anyone were to analyze this information, it would be evident that these occurrences are not explainable by weather phenomena, Venus, or mere misinterpretations.

In a well-known incident, a UFO reportedly took control of a military helicopter, dragging it to an altitude beyond its operational ceiling. Skeptics claimed the pilots had poor vision, yet they had recently passed military eye exams. This is a verified fact! Critics focused on the pilots' eyesight, but a black box recorded everything. How can one dispute that the controls were set to descend, the rotors were configured for an emergency landing, yet the instruments indicated the helicopter was ascending while compasses spun wildly? This event has been discussed, albeit inaccurately, even depicted on the History Channel, which used generic footage of a helicopter instead of the actual model involved. Below is the correct image of a CH-21 Shawnee, known colloquially as the Flying Banana.

CH-21 Shawnee, the Flying Banana

Did you know that the crew addressed the United Nations? I was unaware until Vallée mentioned it in the video below, discussing the assembly's reactions as the pilot recounted his harrowing experience, convinced they were facing imminent death!

It’s impossible to know if this was the sole hostile interaction between UFOs and military forces globally, as militaries typically don’t disclose UFO encounters. Convenient, isn't it? Anecdotal evidence suggests UFOs have attacked military crafts and there have been reports of military forces shooting down UFOs. Just this month, we received news of Russia allegedly doing just that!

Is there an unseen conflict at play? Within this database, there exist classified military UFO encounters, and interactions between UFOs and military aircraft are not always benign. Had David Fravor or his wingman been armed, would their encounter have turned out differently? Would that Tic Tac have been more aggressive? If Fravor had been eliminated by a UFO, would that incident remain classified?

Vallée’s key point is that UFOs display discernment between military and civilian aircraft. They show aggression toward military targets while remaining benign to commercial and private aviation.

With 250,000 incidents involving UFOs across both military and civilian contexts, observed by numerous witnesses and involving FAA and NORAD, we possess verifiable accounts of phenomena that demonstrate discernment and behavioral changes. They recognize non-threatening civilians.

This implies that, despite their advanced technology, our military’s aggression is a nuisance, and occasionally, we are fortunate. Does this suggest they have a vulnerability and prefer to avoid conflict?

Robert Bigelow has, or has had, access to this database. So, when Bigelow stated on 60 Minutes in 2017 that UFOs are extraterrestrial, he isn’t delusional either. The government contracted him to analyze their data! He remains their leading contractor!

Just a thought. If you require data to draw conclusions, THEY HAVE IT!

I’m Not a Journalist

I am merely an enthusiast. My understanding is limited to my experiences, readings, and observations. I have consumed far more literature than I have personal encounters. Unlike Jeremy Corbel, who has passionately pursued this subject, I have not created films. I admire his fearless approach!

I have had my fears. Though I remain cautious about the phenomena, I am growing weary of uncertainty and desire clarity. I am ready to confront the truth.

While I can run statistical analyses to a degree, I am not a mathematician. I can input data and interpret results, but that doesn’t mean I can provide in-depth insights or conduct my own studies. I can critique existing studies and ask pertinent questions, but I lack the expertise to reverse-engineer a study and evaluate its validity. Therefore, I am swayed by the prevalence of studies that collectively support a conclusion rather than relying on a single study.

Even that is subject to scrutiny, given that only certain studies are published, often influenced by financial backers with agendas.

When it comes to UFOs, many mainstream scientists have declined to engage with the data. Some researchers are investigating, but it’s evident that Bigelow compensates those individuals! Numerous armchair scientists are also exploring this area. MUFON, for instance, has existed for quite some time and possesses valuable data. Yet, some scientists dismiss this information as irrelevant, simply because it comes from individuals like John.

However, many highly intelligent individuals contribute to MUFON. There’s no such thing as "good" or "bad" data—there’s only data. Some may hold more relevance or validity than others. But if scientists fail to analyze the data, that’s a fault of theirs, not of those earnestly attempting to conduct science.

If scientists had the number of volunteers that MUFON has, the world would likely be much different! Perhaps if education were more affordable and academic institutions were less restrictive regarding research topics, we’d see a significant shift.

If one can earn college credit for studying Klingon, why can’t individuals explore UFOs or paranormal phenomena?

The database that Vallée has accessed carries a higher degree of validity than most general public data, due to the caliber of witnesses and the technology involved. Multiple aircraft, pilot communications with FAA, radar confirmations, photographs, videos, and gun camera footage elevate this database to an unprecedented level.

Blue Book, Congressional UFO hearings, and UFO reports—if even a thousand cases were deemed unknown, one could easily dismiss them as statistically insignificant, as many would likely be explainable, leaving perhaps only 1 percent truly anomalous. However, that would still be insufficient to capture a scientist's attention.

With 250,000 data points, each possessing numerous high-value variables, we are on the cusp of a paradigm shift. Vallée has clearly stated that the U.S. Military and NASA are well aware of this data and its implications. Given Vallée’s connections and access to this critical information, it’s reasonable to conclude that if NASA is privy to what Vallée knows, the level of cover-up and obfuscation may rise to criminal negligence.

U.S. citizens fund NASA to gather data and share it with us, not to hoard information because they assume we are unprepared for it. We are the taxpayers that finance NASA’s research, and thus, they owe us transparency.

Given Vallée’s esteemed reputation and the accessibility of his insights, why isn’t this discussion gaining traction? Robert Bigelow’s reputation and significance in this conversation continue to resurface. Where are the journalists?

Every host brings their unique perspective. Jeffery Mishlove’s interview with Vallée is included below. Additionally, I’ve highlighted a promo for Jimmy Church’s Into the Vortex, where Vallée asserts that the Roswell crash involved a craft of non-human origins, and that the U.S. military recovered it. Other UFOs from around the globe have also been collected by the military.

This claim could be a bait to attract viewers. Has Vallée made similar statements elsewhere? I believe so, but I can’t pinpoint where or when. Perhaps I’m imagining it? It’s possible. I do tend to exaggerate. I’m amplifying this: why didn’t Mishlove inquire further? Was he deterred, knowing Vallée is under Gaia’s control and that statement might be restricted? Is this why it wasn’t echoed in Fade to Black? Gaia is the channel airing Into the Vortex. Is this evidence of a system controlling the release of information to prevent a societal upheaval?

I doubt it. Jimmy Church appears genuine. True, business is business, but his public persona, trustworthiness, and willingness to openly discuss these phenomena give me confidence in him. He isn’t holding back.

Yet, it feels like a game.

Contract or not, I would be broadcasting this information far and wide! You might think I’m crazy, but shouldn’t we all be this excited?! It’s aliens! This is monumental! Numerous credible individuals, like Vallée, Haim Eshed, and David Fravor, are making these assertions. The fact that we keep having to name-drop is incredibly frustrating!

How long does it take for society to adapt? Galileo was vindicated long before the Church acknowledged his findings. As if the Church had any authority over who enters heaven.

In that context, the world recognized Galileo's correctness before the Church exonerated him. Could it be that everyone is aware of extraterrestrial life except for those in power? They are not waiting for us; they’re waiting for government officials and scientists to wake up.

A nod to Church’s coffee preferences—it’s dark.

But again, if Vallée’s statement in the Into the Vortex promo holds merit, why isn’t it trending on social media? Would Gaia sue TikTok if it went viral? Is this societal apathy evidence of something sinister, or merely the nature of human behavior?

Are we really that slow?

I’m not suggesting that the sky is falling. Apparently, per science, the Earth’s inner core has halted its rotation! Don’t panic. It stopped in 2009, and we’re still here. It has stopped before and resumed, and likely will again, possibly even reversing direction. One day, the magnetic poles will flip. In the future, the North Star will no longer be the North Star, and seasonal changes will reflect that.

But once humanity recognizes the existence of aliens, can we ever go back? Are we delaying this revelation because we can’t return to childhood, and perhaps our parents and spirit guides want us to enjoy our youthful days a bit longer?

Childhood’s End, indeed! If I may add, childhood wasn’t all it’s cracked up to be, and I’m eager to embrace adulthood. But with reservations—who are these other alien adults at the table?

How to Serve Man… let’s avoid that particular table, please.

Where do we go from here? We once believed in Santa Claus, then we grew up and went through phases of disbelief, and now we’re poised to dive headfirst back into a world of wonder. The bizarre, magical chaos surrounding UFOs makes all our collective notions of science fiction and fantasy seem like mere appetizers at the grand buffet ahead.

But does it truly matter where we go from here if only a select group is conducting the analysis? Seriously, why isn’t this gaining momentum?

Share the page:

Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkIn

-----------------------

Recent Post:

Achieving Success Through Fitness and Nutrition Basics

Discover the foundational role of exercise and healthy eating in achieving success in life.

# 5 macOS Applications You Should Skip Installing

Discover which macOS applications are unnecessary and why you should avoid them.

Understanding Why Men Are Often Intimidated by Strong Women

Exploring the dynamics of attraction and the fear some men have towards intelligent women.

Exploring the Scientific View on Life After Death

A scientific exploration of the afterlife debate, highlighting Dr. Sean Carroll's stance on consciousness and mortality.

A Journey of Discovery: My First Week in China

Reflecting on my first week in China, I share the challenges and revelations of living abroad.

A Call to Action: Take Charge of Your Own Future

Embrace personal responsibility and take action to shape your future, rather than waiting for opportunities to come to you.

The Choice Between Immediate Wealth and Future Fortunes

Exploring the dilemma of choosing between $1 million now or $10 million later and what it means for our financial decisions.

Stop Mindlessly Scrolling and Start Reading Instead: A Call to Action

Explore the negative impacts of social media and discover the benefits of reading as a fulfilling alternative.