Intuition vs. Rationality

Some individuals possess a stronger intuitive sense than others. However, this does not imply that those who are less intuitive lack the capacity for intuition altogether. Intuition serves as a method of processing information and deriving practical conclusions. This is a common human experience; if it were ineffective, fewer people would rely on it.

Do intuitive individuals make mistakes? Absolutely. Thomas Edison’s journey to inventing the light bulb is often cited as a testament to the countless failures he faced along the way. He sought the help of Nikola Tesla, who excelled at conceptualizing solutions without the need for physical experimentation, thus saving time and resources.

Is it possible to teach someone the level of insight that Tesla possessed?

Researchers have harnessed intuition in numerous successful ventures. The outcomes of these endeavors are so striking that one might expect more empirically-minded scientists to advocate for intuitive practices. Notable inventions, such as the sewing needle and the structure of DNA, were inspired by dreams. Einstein’s theories on relativity emerged from what he termed thought experiments. Carl Jung’s concept of Active Imagination engaged individuals with their subconscious, leading to therapeutic breakthroughs.

Mental health professionals would benefit from adopting Jung’s approach by exploring how patients' visions and voices reflect their internal struggles. By connecting with individuals through their dreams and experiences, therapists might uncover solutions to their problems. Those who learn to tune into their inner dialogue may achieve profound therapeutic benefits, potentially surpassing conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

Listening can yield remarkable results.

Consider Joan of Arc, who, despite being labeled 'just a girl,' was a figure of immense credibility. Her belief in her experiences inspired men to march into battle and secure victories.

The Significance of Believability

The distinction between health and pathology often lies in functionality. Individuals with clinical hallucinations may face challenges in daily life—they might withdraw socially, neglect self-care, or become irritable and disengaged. In extreme cases, they may be oblivious to their suffering or act dangerously due to their condition.

Conversely, those with positive experiences, such as hearing comforting messages from deceased relatives, are less likely to seek mental health support to eliminate these voices. Why would anyone want to banish a pleasant voice? The crux of the issue is functionality. Individuals who maintain hygiene, prepare meals, engage socially, and even work as mediums are not exhibiting pathology; rather, they are thriving within their communities.

True health is not merely the absence of symptoms, but rather the absence of complaints to the point that one requires remedies to function effectively. Recent articles have reported on a study led by psychologists Peter Moseley and Adam Powell, which seems more like an attempt to pathologize non-standard human experiences rather than genuinely understanding them. The stigma surrounding hearing voices often leads to labeling individuals as 'schizophrenics.'

Hearing voices could be interpreted as an internal dialogue. Neurologists suggest that these experiences may stem from inner thoughts linked to memories, creating a sensation of hearing another voice. Our brains naturally produce auditory stimuli.

Various conditions can lead to hallucinations, but many non-clinical activities can also provoke such experiences—hypnosis, trance states, gazing at static images, listening to ambient sounds, meditation, or even the fluctuations of consciousness during sleep. Simply being human can open the door to these experiences! Our beliefs fundamentally shape our perceptions.

If one only engages with scientific viewpoints that validate their preconceptions, will they ever consider alternative perspectives? Why do so many scholars react negatively to lectures that challenge their beliefs? Isn’t science fundamentally about negotiating various viewpoints in relation to data?

The study referenced in the article connected high absorption levels with beliefs in the paranormal. "High absorption levels" refer to moments when individuals are so engrossed in a mental task that they tune out their surroundings—much like meditation, dance, or sports.

Carl Jung’s practice of active imagination encapsulated this idea! By fostering a heightened sense of absorption, individuals can achieve greater coherence between their conscious and subconscious thoughts. Engaging in deeply absorbing activities may lead to auditory and visual experiences that extend beyond typical data processing, thereby validating the experience rather than invalidating it.

These experiences may indeed have a spiritual dimension. Jung, a prominent figure in psychology, reported auditory and visual hallucinations, framing them as spiritual phenomena. To grasp Jungian therapy fully, one must recognize that he encouraged the acceptance of the paranormal through concepts like synchronicity and the collective unconscious.

There exists a 'veil'—a boundary that is as insubstantial as standing behind a sheet hung out to dry in the sun. Perhaps this sheet symbolizes the unconscious mind, which is vastly more intricate than what the conscious mind can discern, a reality that many psychologists overlook. Alternatively, it might represent spiritual understanding, urging us to acknowledge that there is more to our existence than we often perceive. Could a fusion of psychology and spirituality yield improved outcomes?

Given that psychology originated from an exploration of spirituality, practitioners should reconsider their dismissal of the spiritual beliefs held by those they serve. Increasingly, credible scientific inquiry suggests that the 'paranormal' warrants further examination. Just as advances in technology have enabled us to detect gravitational waves, we may require more refined tools to study spirituality beyond qualitative assessments. Dean Radin is one researcher who has made strides in this area, achieving a level of statistical relevance that reaches 5 sigma.

Achieving 5 sigma relevance led to the proclamation of discovering the Higgs boson, although that conclusion was later questioned. Nevertheless, Dean’s research remains valid, with verification from various laboratories. Any scientist willing to open their mind to genuine inquiry can corroborate these findings.

UFOs are indeed a reality. Carl Jung wrote extensively on the subject, categorizing it within an archetypal framework—an understandable approach, as it still pertains to that proverbial sheet separating us from the sunlight of understanding. Our advancing technology suggests that there may be phenomena reaching us from beyond this metaphorical barrier. The boundaries that once shielded us from 'sun-blindness' are shifting, thanks to new tools that enhance our perception. Increasing evidence in UFO research indicates the existence of technologies that surpass our own, evoking notions of magic or forgotten spiritual concepts.

Ultimately, we find ourselves deliberating on the significance of a spiritual sense. Materialists have effectively argued against spirituality, often based on reasonable, rational principles.

Yet, human beings seldom adhere strictly to rationality. The more we dismiss or suppress emotional, intuitive, and artistic dimensions, the closer we edge towards pathology.

Many psychological constructs that examine 'avoidance' and 'repression' serve as metrics for an inability to function holistically. Conditions like Obsessive Compulsive Disorder emerge from an individual’s desire to evade uncomfortable subconscious thoughts. Sublimation, a well-known repression mechanism, can transform someone into an exceptional surgeon or butcher, providing them with a means to navigate their psyche without descending into psychopathy.

Spiritualists are no more susceptible to corruption than any other demographic. Scientists, too, can compromise ethics in their quest to enhance their economic standing. If any human endeavor tends to elicit the worst aspects of our nature, it is often the current economic systems we employ to distribute resources and gauge human value. Both communism and capitalism can serve beneficial purposes but frequently yield pathological behaviors that harm individuals and the environment.

Why are psychologists concerned that some individuals hear voices or see things that others do not, when many are unable to empathize with fellow humans, animals, and the natural world? Nature encompasses us and surrounds us, yet we frequently overlook signs of distress. How can this not be the most pathological state of humanity in need of intervention?

Aliens reportedly encourage children to care for the planet, as noted by John E. Mack. Whether these experiences are genuine extraterrestrial encounters, archetypal visions, or PTSD-driven hallucinations, the message of environmental stewardship is undeniably positive. Such insights predate scientific proclamations of impending crises, like “Houston, we have a problem.”

Should we disregard the experiences of those who hear and see things? Every piece of fiction encapsulates visions of the unseen, often accompanied by dialogues of unheard voices. John Forbes Nash Jr., the mathematician, solved a complex problem through unique insights. While it’s true that many who hear voices may seem disorganized or incoherent, within that chaos lies a signal that can be understood if one invests the time to listen.

Listening is essential when seeking to identify pathologies and remedies. Validating human experiences fosters well-being. Was this study fruitful? It appears to primarily focus on ways to dismiss experiences without considering whether individuals with atypical cognitive processes can function effectively within their communities and families.

If they are functioning well, why are we studying them? The DSM V primarily categorizes abnormality rather than defining normality.

Humans possess filters that shape their perceptions. To witness the authentic world, we must dismantle the barriers that inhibit our vision.

Recommended:

#### Some humans 'hear voices of the dead' and scientists think they know why SCIENCE may now be able to explain why some claim to hear dead people - and it's a far cry from The Sixth Sense… [www.the-sun.com](https://www.the-sun.com)

#### Researchers Are Figuring Out Why Some People Can 'Hear' Voices of The Dead Scientists have identified the traits that may make a person more likely to claim they hear the voices of the dead… [www.sciencealert.com](https://www.sciencealert.com)