A Call to End Stigmatizing Statements in Opioid Discussions
Written on
Understanding the Harm of Misleading Statements
The phrase “correct use doesn’t equal abuse” is, from a grammatical standpoint, undeniably accurate. However, it becomes problematic in the context of stigma.
While some may use this phrase as a form of self-advocacy, particularly those with chronic pain seeking appropriate treatment with opioids, it can unintentionally perpetuate harmful stereotypes. For instance, a patient might assert this statement to assure their healthcare provider that they will not misuse their medication, thereby emphasizing their “correct” usage. This rationale is understandable, as individuals with chronic pain often need to advocate for the care they require.
However, it is critical to consider the implications of such a stance. By defining a clear division, it inadvertently suggests that those who misuse medications are not using them "correctly."
The Consequences of Division
This perspective posits that individuals labeled as “abusers” are not adhering to proper usage, indicating that they may use opioids unpredictably or outside prescribed guidelines. Such behavior could stem from various motivations—ranging from recreational use to underlying addiction issues. It’s crucial to recognize that not everyone who uses opioids for recreational purposes necessarily has an opioid use disorder. Many individuals might not even be aware of their condition, particularly if they’re actively using drugs to manage withdrawal symptoms or chronic pain.
Consider a person who enters recovery after grappling with opioid use disorder. Whether through medication-assisted treatment like buprenorphine or methadone, or through other recovery methods, they now carry a history of what some may label as “incorrect” usage. Should these individuals, despite their past, still receive ethical and appropriate treatment, including pain management with opioids? Advocating for all patients would compel us to answer affirmatively.
Even for those still in the throes of addiction, the question remains: do they not also deserve fair treatment, including the use of opioids for pain management? If we truly advocate for all patients, the answer must again be yes.
Stigma and Its Broader Implications
The core issue is that the term "ALL" must encompass everyone without exceptions. Imposing arbitrary boundaries regarding ethical treatment perpetuates stigma, particularly against marginalized groups.
Drugs themselves are ethically neutral; their value is shaped by societal perceptions and political contexts. We should resist allowing ingrained moral beliefs to deepen divides and perpetuate stigma against vulnerable populations.
The harmful stigma affecting those with substance use disorders ultimately obstructs all of us from accessing the timely and ethical care we need. If we wish to be advocates for all patients, we must dismantle barriers and challenge divisions, even when these boundaries seem protective.
In conclusion, we must remember that advocating for inclusivity means that all individuals, regardless of their history or current circumstances, deserve dignity and access to necessary treatment.